Skip to content

Retraction data · updated 2026-10-06

Retracted papers published in 2015

Papers published in 2015that have since been formally withdrawn from the scientific record, computed from the CiteDash catalog. Retraction is slow: investigations take years, so this count keeps rising and today’s number is a floor, not a final verdict on 2015.

257

retracted papers from 2015 so far

8.1

per 10,000 papers published in 2015

316,224

2015 papers in the catalog

Most-cited retracted papers of 2015

Ranked by citation count: the retracted papers from 2015 that other research leaned on most, which is exactly why each retraction matters. Anything citing them inherits the problem.

  • RETRACTEDCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

    Steroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and stents for superior vena caval obstruction in carcinoma of the bronchus

    doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001316.pub2

  • RETRACTEDDrug Design Development and Therapy

    Plumbagin induces cell cycle arrest and autophagy and suppresses epithelial to mesenchymal transition involving PI3K/Akt/mTOR-mediated pathway in human pancreatic cancer cells

    doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s73689

  • RETRACTEDDrug Design Development and Therapy

    Alisertib induces cell cycle arrest and autophagy and suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition involving PI3K/Akt/mTOR and sirtuin 1-mediated signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancer cells

    doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s75221

  • RETRACTEDScience Advances

    Individualistic sensitivities and exposure to climate change explain variation in species’ distribution and abundance changes

    doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400220

  • RETRACTEDJournal of Ecology

    <i>Retracted</i>: Does natural variation in diversity affect biotic resistance?

    doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12439

  • RETRACTEDOncology Reports

    MicroRNA-124-3p inhibits the growth and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by targeting STAT3

    doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4524

  • RETRACTEDOncology Reports

    MicroRNA-204 inhibits proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in osteosarcoma cells via targeting Sirtuin 1

    doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.3986

  • RETRACTEDOncoTargets and Therapy

    miR-132 can inhibit glioma cells invasion and migration by target MMP16 in vitro

    doi.org/10.2147/ott.s79282

Method and scope

Figures are aggregates over the CiteDash catalog; retraction status comes from the open scholarly catalogs (OpenAlex, drawing on Crossref and Retraction Watch data). They describe this catalog, not the whole scholarly record, and the rate per 10,000 is the safer number to quote. Aggregates recompute twice a day. Cite as: CiteDash Retraction Data, citedash.ai/retractions/2015, updated 2026-10-06. CC BY 4.0.

Citing anything from 2015? Check it before an examiner does.

Paste a DOI or a whole reference list and screen every entry for retractions, free.

Research-integrity data in your inbox

A short welcome series, then occasional practical emails on citations, references, and thesis writing from CiteDash. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Retractions of 2015: FAQ

What does it mean when a paper is retracted?

The journal has formally withdrawn it from the scientific record, usually after finding fabricated data, plagiarism, unreliable results, or compromised peer review. A retracted paper should not be cited as evidence, and examiners and journals actively check reference lists for them.

Where do these numbers come from?

They are computed from the research papers indexed in the CiteDash catalog, with retraction status drawn from the open scholarly catalogs (OpenAlex, which incorporates Crossref and Retraction Watch data). They describe this catalog, not the entire scholarly record, so absolute counts will differ from databases with different coverage.

Why do recent years show fewer retractions?

Retraction is slow: investigations, institutional reviews, and journal processes routinely take years. A paper published recently has had little time to be caught, so recent years' counts keep rising for a decade or more. A small number for last year says nothing about how many of its papers will eventually be retracted.

Does a journal appearing on this page mean it is a bad journal?

No, and the reverse is also false. Large journals publish more of everything, including papers later retracted, and a high count can reflect a journal that actively investigates and cleans up its record. Equally, a journal missing from this page is not certified clean: it may simply have too few papers in our catalog to report on responsibly.

How do I check my own references for retractions?

Paste any DOI into the free retraction checker, or paste a whole reference list into the bibliography checker to screen every entry at once. Inside CiteDash, every paper is screened automatically and continuously before it can enter a bibliography.