Retraction data · updated 2026-10-06
Retracted papers published in 2016
Papers published in 2016that have since been formally withdrawn from the scientific record, computed from the CiteDash catalog. Retraction is slow: investigations take years, so this count keeps rising and today’s number is a floor, not a final verdict on 2016.
333
retracted papers from 2016 so far
9.1
per 10,000 papers published in 2016
364,934
2016 papers in the catalog
Most-cited retracted papers of 2016
Ranked by citation count: the retracted papers from 2016 that other research leaned on most, which is exactly why each retraction matters. Anything citing them inherits the problem.
- RETRACTEDScientific Reports
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Increased Gut Redox and Depletion of Anaerobic and Methanogenic Prokaryotes in Severe Acute Malnutrition
- RETRACTEDScience Advances
RETRACTED: A universal cooperative assembly-directed method for coating of mesoporous TiO <sub>2</sub> nanoshells with enhanced lithium storage properties
- RETRACTEDPhysics Letters B
Measurement of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math> production cross-section using eμ events with b-tagged jets in pp collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si107.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>TeV</mml:mtext></mml:math> with the ATLAS detector
- RETRACTEDScientific Reports
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Silencing of Histone Deacetylase 9 Expression in Podocytes Attenuates Kidney Injury in Diabetic Nephropathy
- RETRACTEDJournal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
RETRACTED: Synthesis and cardiovascular protective effects of quercetin 7‐O‐sialic acid
- RETRACTEDArtificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of safranal loaded mucoadhesive nanoemulsion on oxidative stress markers in cerebral ischemia
- RETRACTEDPLoS ONE
Transcriptome and Multivariable Data Analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum under Different Dissolved Oxygen Conditions in Bioreactors
- RETRACTEDFrontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
The Two-Component System CpxRA Negatively Regulates the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Involving σ32 and Lon protease
Method and scope
Figures are aggregates over the CiteDash catalog; retraction status comes from the open scholarly catalogs (OpenAlex, drawing on Crossref and Retraction Watch data). They describe this catalog, not the whole scholarly record, and the rate per 10,000 is the safer number to quote. Aggregates recompute twice a day. Cite as: CiteDash Retraction Data, citedash.ai/retractions/2016, updated 2026-10-06. CC BY 4.0.
Citing anything from 2016? Check it before an examiner does.
Paste a DOI or a whole reference list and screen every entry for retractions, free.
Research-integrity data in your inbox
A short welcome series, then occasional practical emails on citations, references, and thesis writing from CiteDash. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Retractions of 2016: FAQ
What does it mean when a paper is retracted?
The journal has formally withdrawn it from the scientific record, usually after finding fabricated data, plagiarism, unreliable results, or compromised peer review. A retracted paper should not be cited as evidence, and examiners and journals actively check reference lists for them.
Where do these numbers come from?
They are computed from the research papers indexed in the CiteDash catalog, with retraction status drawn from the open scholarly catalogs (OpenAlex, which incorporates Crossref and Retraction Watch data). They describe this catalog, not the entire scholarly record, so absolute counts will differ from databases with different coverage.
Why do recent years show fewer retractions?
Retraction is slow: investigations, institutional reviews, and journal processes routinely take years. A paper published recently has had little time to be caught, so recent years' counts keep rising for a decade or more. A small number for last year says nothing about how many of its papers will eventually be retracted.
Does a journal appearing on this page mean it is a bad journal?
No, and the reverse is also false. Large journals publish more of everything, including papers later retracted, and a high count can reflect a journal that actively investigates and cleans up its record. Equally, a journal missing from this page is not certified clean: it may simply have too few papers in our catalog to report on responsibly.
How do I check my own references for retractions?
Paste any DOI into the free retraction checker, or paste a whole reference list into the bibliography checker to screen every entry at once. Inside CiteDash, every paper is screened automatically and continuously before it can enter a bibliography.